Edmund Awah v. Midland Credit Management

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit February 2, 2012

Opinion

No. 11-2028

Plaintiff - Appellant,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Roger W. Titus, District Judge. (8:10- cv-00885-RWT)

Submitted: January 31, 2012 Decided: February 2, 2012

Before NIEMEYER, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Edmund K. Awah, Appellant Pro Se. Ronald S. Canter, THE LAW OFFICE OF RONALD S. CANTER, LLC, Rockville, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Edmund K. Awah appeals the district court’s order

granting Defendant’s motion to strike his amended complaint

and/or dismiss the complaint because Awah failed to file his

amended complaint within the time allowed by the court’s prior

order. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible

error. See Thompson v. E.I. DuPont de Nemours & Co., Inc.,

(4th Cir. 1996) (holding that decision to find

excusable neglect on a late filing is reviewed for an abuse of

discretion). Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by

the district court. Awah v. Midland Credit Mgmt. of Am., No.

8:10-cv-00885-RWT (D. Md. Aug. 26, 2011). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.