U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2012

Stephen Alberts, II v. Wheeling Jesuit University

Stephen Alberts, II v. Wheeling Jesuit University
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided January 9, 2012

Stephen Alberts, II v. Wheeling Jesuit University

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-1596

STEPHEN ALAN ALBERTS, II, Ed.D., Plaintiff – Appellant, v. WHEELING JESUIT UNIVERSITY, Defendant – Appellee, and DR. LETHA ZOOK, Defendant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Wheeling. Frederick P. Stamp, Jr., Senior District Judge. (5:09-cv-00109-FPS-JES)

Submitted: November 30, 2011 Decided: January 9, 2012

Before WILKINSON, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Stephen Alan Alberts, II, Appellant Pro Se. Jacob A. Manning, Christopher Paull Riley, DINSMORE & SHOHL, LLP, Wheeling, West Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Stephen Alan Alberts, II, appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment on his retaliation claims brought pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17 (2006), and the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967, as amended, 29 U.S.C. §§ 621 to 634 (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error or evidence of judicial bias. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Alberts v. Wheeling Jesuit University, No. 5:09-cv-00109-FPS-JES (N.D.W.

Va. May 25, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.