H. Austin v. Douglas Peterson & Associates

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

H. Austin v. Douglas Peterson & Associates

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-2427

H. RICHARD AUSTIN,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

DOUGLAS G. PETERSON & ASSOCIATES; STEPHEN HOUGHTON; JIMMY PAU,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. W. Earl Britt, Senior District Judge. (5:11-cv-00373-BR)

Submitted: February 16, 2012 Decided: February 21, 2012

Before SHEDD, KEENAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

H. Richard Austin, Appellant Pro Se. George L. Goodridge, CURTISS, CAREY, GATES, GRAVES & GOODRIDGE, LLP, Greenfield, Massachusetts; Paul Marshall Yoder, WHARTON ALDHIZER & WEAVER, PLC, Harrisonburg, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

H. Richard Austin appeals the district court’s order

dismissing his claims against all defendants. We have reviewed

the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm

for the reasons stated by the district court. Austin v. Douglas

G. Peterson & Assocs., No. 5:11-cv-00373-BR (E.D.N.C. Dec. 1,

2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished