Lorenzo Richardson v. State of North Carolina
Lorenzo Richardson v. State of North Carolina
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 11-1744
LORENZO DOMINIC RICHARDSON, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Dever, III, Chief District Judge. (5:11-cv-00081-D)
Submitted: February 9, 2012 Decided: December 13, 2012
Before WILKINSON, AGEE, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Lorenzo Dominic Richardson, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: Lorenzo Dominic Richardson appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Richardson v. North Carolina, No. 5:11-cv-00081-D (E.D.N.C. July 5, 2011). We deny Richardson’s motion for relief, and we dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.