U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2012

Marvin Witherspoon v. Patricia Stansberry

Marvin Witherspoon v. Patricia Stansberry
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided February 8, 2012

Marvin Witherspoon v. Patricia Stansberry

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-7230

MARVIN HAROLD WITHERSPOON, Petitioner – Appellant, v. PATRICIA R. STANSBERRY, Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, Senior District Judge. (3:10-cv-00323-REP)

Submitted: January 30, 2012 Decided: February 8, 2012

Before GREGORY, DUNCAN, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Marvin Harold Witherspoon, Appellant Pro Se. Jonathan Holland Hambrick, Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Marvin Harold Witherspoon, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2241 (West 2006 & Supp. 2011) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.

Witherspoon v. Stansberry, No. 3:10-cv-00323-REP (E.D. Va. July 29, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.