U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2012

Jennifer Coates v. Mayor and City Council of Baltimore

Jennifer Coates v. Mayor and City Council of Baltimore
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided August 23, 2012

Jennifer Coates v. Mayor and City Council of Baltimore

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-1358

JENNIFER COATES, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF BALTIMORE; KIMBERLY WASHINGTON; STEPHANIE RAWLINGS-BLAKE, All, jointly and severally, Defendants - Appellees, and CITY OF BALTIMORE, Defendant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. James K. Bredar, District Judge. (1:10-cv-03419-JKB)

Submitted: August 16, 2012 Decided: August 23, 2012

Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Thomas Joseph Maronick, Jr., THE LAW OFFICE OF THOMAS J.

MARONICK, JR., LLC, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellant. George A. Nilson, City Solicitor, Gary Gilkey, Chief Solicitor, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Jennifer Coates appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of the Mayor and City Council of Baltimore and individual defendants Kimberly Washington and Stephanie Rawlings-Blake in this employment discrimination action pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (“Title VII”), 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-2000e-17 (West 2003 & Supp. 2010). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Coates v. The Mayor & City Council of Balt., No. 1:10-cv-03419-JKB (D. Md. Feb. 14, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.