U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2012

United States v. Herman Ingram

United States v. Herman Ingram
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided August 21, 2012

United States v. Herman Ingram

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-6840

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. HERMAN LEE INGRAM, Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Henry E. Hudson, District Judge. (3:05-cr-00361-HEH-1)

Submitted: August 16, 2012 Decided: August 21, 2012

Before KING and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Herman Lee Ingram, Appellant Pro Se. Olivia L. Norman, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Herman Lee Ingram appeals the district court’s order denying his motion seeking a reduction of sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582 (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error, given that Ingram is ineligible for the reduction that he seeks. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court. United States v. Ingram, No. 3:05-cr-00361- HEH-1 (E.D. Va. Apr. 17, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.