U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2012

Matthew O'Brien v. Mr. Summerfield

Matthew O'Brien v. Mr. Summerfield
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided August 21, 2012

Matthew O'Brien v. Mr. Summerfield

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-6812

MATTHEW SPENCER O’BRIEN, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. MR. SUMMERFIELD, Defendant – Appellee, and DR. BROOKS; BOBBY P. SHEARIN; J. MICHAEL STOUFFER; SCOTT S.

OAKLEY, Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Ellen Lipton Hollander, District Judge. (1:11-cv-02346-ELH)

Submitted: August 16, 2012 Decided: August 21, 2012

Before KING and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Matthew Spencer O’Brien, Appellant Pro Se. Daniel Christopher Costello, WHARTON, LEVIN, EHRMANTRAUT, KLEIN & NASH, Annapolis, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Matthew Spencer O’Brien appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint.

We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. O’Brien v. Summerfield, No. 1:11-cv-02346-ELH (D. Md. Feb. 21, 2012; Apr. 5, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.