U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2012

Barkley Gardner v. Troy Williamson

Barkley Gardner v. Troy Williamson
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided August 21, 2012

Barkley Gardner v. Troy Williamson

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-7063

BARKLEY GARDNER, Petitioner - Appellant, v. TROY WILLIAMSON; U.S. BUREAU OF PRISONS, Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, Senior District Judge. (4:95-cr-00041-H-8; 5:08-CV-02050-h)

Submitted: August 16, 2012 Decided: August 21, 2012

Before KING and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Barkley Gardner, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Barkley Gardner appeals the district court’s orders denying his motion under Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) and his motion under Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Gardner v. Williamson, Nos. 4:95-cr-00041-H-8; 5:08-cv-02050-H (E.D.N.C., Oct. 13, 2011; June 8, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.