Anthony Smith v. Treasury Inspection General
Anthony Smith v. Treasury Inspection General
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 12-1298
ANTHONY YEMOH SMITH, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. TREASURY INSPECTION GENERAL FOR TAX ADMINISTRATION (TIGTA), Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. James K. Bredar, District Judge. (1:11-cv-02033-JKB)
Submitted: July 26, 2012 Decided: August 14, 2012
Before NIEMEYER, DAVIS, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Anthony Yemoh Smith, Appellant Pro Se. Jonathan S. Cohen, Kenneth W. Rosenberg, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: Anthony Yemoh Smith appeals the district court’s orders dismissing his Privacy Act complaint and his motion to amend his complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we grant Smith’s motion to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Smith v. Treasury Inspection Gen. for Tax Admin., No. 1:11-cv-02033-JKB (D. Md. filed Dec. 1, 2011 & entered Dec. 2, 2011; Jan. 4, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.