U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2012

Anthony McNeish v. Big Sarge Bail Bonds

Anthony McNeish v. Big Sarge Bail Bonds
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided August 10, 2012

Anthony McNeish v. Big Sarge Bail Bonds

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-6633

ANTHONY MCNEISH, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. BIG SARGE BAIL BONDS ASSOCIATES INC.; MANLEY YATES; JOHN DOE, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (5:11-cv-00739-BO)

Submitted: August 1, 2012 Decided: August 10, 2012

Before NIEMEYER, GREGORY, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Anthony McNeish, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Anthony McNeish appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for leave to amend his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint after it was dismissed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See McNeish v. Big Sarge Bail Bonds Assocs., No. 5:11-cv-00739-BO (E.D.N.C. Mar. 19, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.