United States v. Lafawn Bobbitt

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

United States v. Lafawn Bobbitt

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-7347

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

LAFAWN DEWAYNE BOBBITT, a/k/a Mandingo, a/k/a Dingo,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. John A. Gibney, Jr., District Judge. (3:97-cr-00169-JAG-1)

Submitted: November 13, 2012 Decided: November 15, 2012

Before NIEMEYER, GREGORY, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Lafawn Dewayne Bobbitt, Appellant Pro Se. Richard Daniel Cooke, Assistant United States Attorney, Brian R. Hood, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Lafawn Dewayne Bobbitt appeals the district court’s

order denying his motion for appointment of counsel to

investigate new evidence in his criminal case. Bobbitt was

convicted in 1998; this court affirmed the conviction and later

denied Bobbitt relief under

28 U.S.C.A. § 2255

(West Supp.

2012). Because Bobbitt is not eligible for court-appointed

counsel at this juncture, we affirm the order of the district

court. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished