U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2012

United States v. Lafawn Bobbitt

United States v. Lafawn Bobbitt
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided November 15, 2012

United States v. Lafawn Bobbitt

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-7347

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. LAFAWN DEWAYNE BOBBITT, a/k/a Mandingo, a/k/a Dingo, Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. John A. Gibney, Jr., District Judge. (3:97-cr-00169-JAG-1)

Submitted: November 13, 2012 Decided: November 15, 2012

Before NIEMEYER, GREGORY, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Lafawn Dewayne Bobbitt, Appellant Pro Se. Richard Daniel Cooke, Assistant United States Attorney, Brian R. Hood, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Lafawn Dewayne Bobbitt appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for appointment of counsel to investigate new evidence in his criminal case. Bobbitt was convicted in 1998; this court affirmed the conviction and later denied Bobbitt relief under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2012). Because Bobbitt is not eligible for court-appointed counsel at this juncture, we affirm the order of the district court. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.