U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2012

James Gibson v. Wells Fargo Bank

James Gibson v. Wells Fargo Bank
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided January 4, 2012

James Gibson v. Wells Fargo Bank

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-1165

JAMES O. GIBSON; TERI GIBSON, Plaintiffs - Appellants, v. WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.; OCWEN LOAN SERVICING, LLC, Defendants – Appellees, and NECTAR PROJECTS, INCORPORATED, Defendant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Liam O’Grady, District Judge. (1:10-cv-00304-LO-IDD)

Submitted: December 13, 2011 Decided: January 4, 2012

Before MOTZ, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Christopher Edwin Brown, BROWN, BROWN, & BROWN, PC, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellants. D. Margeaux Witherspoon, Rachel McGuckian, MILES & STOCKBRIDGE, P.C., McLean, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: James O. Gibson and Teri Gibson appeal the district court’s orders denying the Gibsons leave to amend their responses to the Appellees’ requests for admissions and granting summary judgment against the Gibsons in their action seeking to prevent the Appellees from foreclosing on their property. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. In particular, we reject the Gibsons’ assertion that our holding in Horvath v. Bank of New York, N.A., 641 F.3d 617 (4th Cir. 2011), precludes entry of summary judgment in favor of the Appellees and requires summary judgment in the Gibsons’ favor.

Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.