David Conn v. Kenneth Stolle
David Conn v. Kenneth Stolle
460 F. App'x 276
David Conn v. Kenneth Stolle
Opinion
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding px-ecedent in this circuit.
David William Conn appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Conn v. Stolle, Case No. 1:11-cv-00758-CMH-TCB, 2011 WL 3321136 (E.D.Va. Aug. 2, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and ai-gument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.