U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2012

David Conn v. Kenneth Stolle

David Conn v. Kenneth Stolle
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided January 5, 2012 · Wilkinson, Motz, Agee
460 F. App'x 276

David Conn v. Kenneth Stolle

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding px-ecedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

David William Conn appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Conn v. Stolle, Case No. 1:11-cv-00758-CMH-TCB, 2011 WL 3321136 (E.D.Va. Aug. 2, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and ai-gument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.