Michael Hunt v. Tony Rand

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Michael Hunt v. Tony Rand

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-7158

MICHAEL EUGENE HUNT,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

TONY RAND,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Louise W. Flanagan, District Judge. (5:10-ct-03139-FL)

Submitted: January 5, 2012 Decided: January 12, 2012

Before NIEMEYER and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Michael Eugene Hunt, Appellant Pro Se. Elizabeth F. Parsons, Assistant Attorney General, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Michael Eugene Hunt appeals the district court’s order

denying relief on his

42 U.S.C. § 1983

(2006) complaint. We

have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court. Hunt v. Rand, No. 5:10-ct-03139-FL (E.D.N.C. Aug. 18,

2011). We deny Hunt’s motion for appointment of counsel. We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished