Hugh Wade v. Wenelisa Navarro

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Hugh Wade v. Wenelisa Navarro

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-6387

HUGH MAURICE ALLEN WADE,

Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

WENELISA NAVARRO, M.D.; ISAIAS TESSEMA, M.D.; ERWIN ALDANA, M.D.,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Alexander Williams, Jr., District Judge. (8:09-cv-01985-AW)

Submitted: January 20, 2012 Decided: February 1, 2012

Before SHEDD, AGEE, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Hugh Maurice Allen Wade, Appellant Pro Se. Philip Melton Andrews, Katrina J. Dennis, KRAMON & GRAHAM, PA, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Hugh Maurice Allen Wade appeals from the grant of

summary judgment to Defendants in his

42 U.S.C. § 1983

(2006)

suit. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm substantially for the reasons stated by

the district court. Wade v. Navarro, No. 8:09-cv-01985-AW (D.

Md. filed Sept. 11 & entered Sept. 14, 2009; filed May 17 &

entered May 18, 2010; Feb. 8, 2011). In addition, we decline to

exercise continuing jurisdiction over Wade’s case. See

Procunier v. Martinez,

416 U.S. 396, 404-05

(1974) (absent

constitutional violations, federal courts should be reluctant to

interfere with state prison administration). We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished