U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2012

Ronald Brunson v. Fbi

Ronald Brunson v. Fbi
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided February 2, 2012

Ronald Brunson v. Fbi

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-2088

RONALD BRUNSON, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, Defendant - Appellee.

No. 11-2097

RONALD BRUNSON, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, District of South Carolina; CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY; FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION; STEVE PATTERSON, Intercity Broadcasting; NAACP, National Association Advancement Colored People; STATE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, NAACP; PRESIDENT RUBY JOHNSON, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Paige Jones Gossett, Magistrate Judge. (3:11-cv-02132-JFA; 3:11-cv-02313-JFA)

Submitted: January 31, 2012 Decided: February 2, 2012 Before NIEMEYER, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Ronald Brunson, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: In these consolidated cases, Ronald Brunson seeks to appeal the magistrate judge’s reports recommending that the district court, dismiss Brunson’s complaints. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2006), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2006); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949). The orders Brunson seeks to appeal are neither final orders nor are they appealable interlocutory or collateral orders. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeals for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.