United States v. Steve Hickman
United States v. Steve Hickman
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 11-6850
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. STEVE HICKMAN, a/k/a Steve Miller, Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (5:93-cr-00144-BO-2)
Submitted: December 6, 2011 Decided: February 2, 2012
Before NIEMEYER and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Steve Hickman, Appellant Pro Se. Jennifer P. May-Parker, Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: Steve Hickman appeals the district court’s order denying his motion to reconsider its previous denial of his motion to modify sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006).
We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Hickman, No. 5:93-cr-00144-BO-2 (E.D.N.C. Feb. 10, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.