U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2012

Stanley Reeder, Jr. v. C/o Staunton

Stanley Reeder, Jr. v. C/o Staunton
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided February 2, 2012

Stanley Reeder, Jr. v. C/o Staunton

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-6883

STANLEY L. REEDER, JR., Plaintiff - Appellant, v. C/O STAUNTON, Sheriff; SHERIFF OF STAUNTON, VIRGINIA; DEPUTY SHERIFF GREGORY; CAPTAIN NICHOLSON; JOHN DOE #1; JOHN DOE #2, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Glen E. Conrad, Chief District Judge. (7:11-cv-00299-GEC)

Submitted: January 31, 2012 Decided: February 2, 2012

Before NIEMEYER, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Stanley L. Reeder, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Stanley L. Reeder, Jr., appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint.

We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Reeder v. Staunton, No. 7:11-cv-00299-GEC (W.D. Va. June, 30, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.