James Giles v. Doctor Allan Walls

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

James Giles v. Doctor Allan Walls

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-7156

JAMES A. GILES,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

DOCTOR ALLAN WALLS; DOCTOR EILLEN DELANEY; DOCTOR ROBERT POILETMAN; MRS. AMY ENLOE,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Rock Hill. David C. Norton, District Judge. (0:10-cv-00959-DCN)

Submitted: January 31, 2012 Decided: February 3, 2012

Before NIEMEYER, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

James A. Giles, Appellant Pro Se. Steven Michael Pruitt, MCDONALD, PATRICK, TINSLEY, BAGGETT & POSTON, Greenwood, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

James A. Giles appeals the district court’s orders

accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying

relief on his

42 U.S.C. § 1983

(2006) complaint and the court’s

order denying his motion to alter or amend the judgment under

Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e). We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated

by the district court. Giles v. Walls, No. 0:10-cv-00959-DCN

(D.S.C. Aug. 8, 2011; Aug. 17, 2011; Aug. 24, 2011). We deny

Giles’ motion to appoint counsel. We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished