Robert Royster v. Detective McKeon

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Robert Royster v. Detective McKeon

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-7160

ROBERT ROYSTER,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

DETECTIVE P. MCKEON; DETECTIVE M. FAULCON; DETECTIVE PATCHIN; DETECTIVE GIBNEY,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (5:09-ct-03111-BO)

Submitted: January 31, 2012 Decided: February 3, 2012

Before NIEMEYER, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Robert Royster, Appellant Pro Se. Dorothy Kibler Leapley, Deputy City Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Robert Royster appeals the district court’s order

denying relief on his

42 U.S.C. § 1983

(2006) complaint. We

have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma

pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court. Royster v. McKeon, No. 5:09-ct-03111-BO (E.D.N.C. Aug.

16, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished