Daughton Lacey, Jr. v. Daniel Braxton
Daughton Lacey, Jr. v. Daniel Braxton
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 11-7173
DAUGHTON W. LACEY, JR., a/k/a Baruch Yah Hawkins,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
DANIEL A. BRAXTON, Warden; STEVE HOLLAR, Assistant Warden; TRACY LAWHORN, Treatment Program Supervisor; LIEUTENANT PERRY; SERGEANT STICKLER, C/O; WORKMAN, C/O; GRIFFIN, C/O; JOHN GARMAN, Regional Director; JOHN JABE, Deputy Director of Operations; LIEUTENANT CANTERBURY; PHYLLIS BYRD, Law Library Supervisor,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, Senior District Judge. (7:10-cv-00139-JLK)
Submitted: January 31, 2012 Decided: February 3, 2012
Before NIEMEYER, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Daughton W. Lacey, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Richard Carson Vorhis, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Daughton W. Lacey, Jr., appeals the district court’s
order denying his motion for a preliminary injunction in his
42 U.S.C. § 1983(2006) action. We have reviewed the record and
find no abuse of discretion. See Cienna Corp. v. Jarrard,
203 F.3d 312, 322(4th Cir. 2000) (providing review standard).
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. Lacey v. Braxton, No. 7:10-cv-00139-JLK (W.D. Va. Aug.
1, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished