Daughton Lacey, Jr. v. Daniel Braxton

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Daughton Lacey, Jr. v. Daniel Braxton

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-7173

DAUGHTON W. LACEY, JR., a/k/a Baruch Yah Hawkins,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

DANIEL A. BRAXTON, Warden; STEVE HOLLAR, Assistant Warden; TRACY LAWHORN, Treatment Program Supervisor; LIEUTENANT PERRY; SERGEANT STICKLER, C/O; WORKMAN, C/O; GRIFFIN, C/O; JOHN GARMAN, Regional Director; JOHN JABE, Deputy Director of Operations; LIEUTENANT CANTERBURY; PHYLLIS BYRD, Law Library Supervisor,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, Senior District Judge. (7:10-cv-00139-JLK)

Submitted: January 31, 2012 Decided: February 3, 2012

Before NIEMEYER, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Daughton W. Lacey, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Richard Carson Vorhis, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Daughton W. Lacey, Jr., appeals the district court’s

order denying his motion for a preliminary injunction in his

42 U.S.C. § 1983

(2006) action. We have reviewed the record and

find no abuse of discretion. See Cienna Corp. v. Jarrard,

203 F.3d 312, 322

(4th Cir. 2000) (providing review standard).

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court. Lacey v. Braxton, No. 7:10-cv-00139-JLK (W.D. Va. Aug.

1, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished