United States v. Rolandus Pipkin
Opinion
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Rolandus Demetrius Pipkin appeals the district court’s order denying his motion to modify the district court’s judgment revoking his supervised release. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Pipkin, No. 1:00-cr-00134-JAB-1 (M.D.N.C. July 22, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Rolandus Demetrius PIPKIN, Defendant—Appellant
- Status
- Unpublished