Lynn Mendes v. Charles Brown
Lynn Mendes v. Charles Brown
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 11-1710
LYNN ELLEN MENDES, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. CHARLES BROWN; CHARLOTTE MECKLENBURG PUBLIC LIBRARY, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Richard L. Voorhees, District Judge. (3:10-cv-00397-RLV-DCK)
Submitted: February 9, 2012 Decided: February 13, 2012
Before WILKINSON, AGEE, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Lynn Ellen Mendes, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: Lynn Ellen Mendes appeals the district court’s orders dismissing her 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint as frivolous under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2006), and denying reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Mendes v. Brown, No. 3:10-cv-00397-RLV- DCK (W.D.N.C. Nov. 19, 2010; Aug. 29, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.