Lorenzo Richardson v. Corinda Greene

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Lorenzo Richardson v. Corinda Greene

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-1743

LORENZO DOMINIC RICHARDSON,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

CORINDA GREENE,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, Senior District Judge. (5:11-cv-00072-H)

Submitted: February 9, 2012 Decided: February 13, 2012

Before WILKINSON, AGEE, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Lorenzo Dominic Richardson, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Lorenzo Dominic Richardson appeals the district

court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate

judge and dismissing for lack of jurisdiction his complaint in

which he sought to appeal the state court’s denial of his

request to appeal his North Carolina criminal conviction. See

28 U.S.C. § 1915

(e)(2)(B) (2006). We have reviewed the record

and find no reversible error. See District of Columbia Court of

Appeals v. Feldman,

460 U.S. 462, 482

(1983). Accordingly, we

deny Richardson’s motion for relief and affirm for the reasons

stated by the district court. Richardson v. Greene, No. 5:11-

cv-00072-H (E.D.N.C. July 6, 2011). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished