James Roudabush v. Thomas Belk

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

James Roudabush v. Thomas Belk

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-1968

JAMES L. ROUDABUSH,

Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

THOMAS M. BELK, JR.; BELK STORES, INC.; JAN W. WALKE; HARNEY; SPOTSYLVANIA COUNTY SHERIFF; WILLIAM NEELY; JOHN DOE, Loss Prevention Officer,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Graham C. Mullen, Senior District Judge. (3:11-cv-00255-GCM)

Submitted: January 17, 2012 Decided: February 13, 2012

Before WILKINSON, AGEE, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

James L. Roudabush, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

James L. Roudabush appeals the district court’s orders

dismissing his

42 U.S.C. § 1983

(2006) complaint and denying his

Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) motion. We have reviewed the record and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the

reasons stated by the district court. Roudabush v. Belk,

No. 3:11-cv-00255-GCM (W.D.N.C. Aug. 8 & 19, 2011). We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished