James Roudabush v. Thomas Belk
James Roudabush v. Thomas Belk
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 11-1968
JAMES L. ROUDABUSH,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
THOMAS M. BELK, JR.; BELK STORES, INC.; JAN W. WALKE; HARNEY; SPOTSYLVANIA COUNTY SHERIFF; WILLIAM NEELY; JOHN DOE, Loss Prevention Officer,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Graham C. Mullen, Senior District Judge. (3:11-cv-00255-GCM)
Submitted: January 17, 2012 Decided: February 13, 2012
Before WILKINSON, AGEE, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
James L. Roudabush, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
James L. Roudabush appeals the district court’s orders
dismissing his
42 U.S.C. § 1983(2006) complaint and denying his
Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) motion. We have reviewed the record and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court. Roudabush v. Belk,
No. 3:11-cv-00255-GCM (W.D.N.C. Aug. 8 & 19, 2011). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished