Rose Isbell v. Stephen Friedman

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Rose Isbell v. Stephen Friedman

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-2113

ROSE ISBELL,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

STEPHEN FRIEDMAN; JOSEPH, GREENWALD AND LAAKE, PA,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Alexander Williams, Jr., District Judge. (8:11-cv-01152-AW)

Submitted: February 9, 2012 Decided: February 13, 2012

Before WILKINSON, AGEE, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Rose Isbell, Appellant Pro Se. Joseph Michael Creed, Veronica B. Nannis, JOSEPH, GREENWALD & LAAKE, PA, Greenbelt, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Rose Isbell appeals the district court’s order

dismissing her complaint pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6).

We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court. Isbell v. Friedman, No. 8:11-cv-01152-AW (D. Md. filed

Sept. 16, 2011, entered Sept. 19, 2011). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished