UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-2125

TORNELLO FONTAINE, pierce el-bey Grantor Washitaw de Dugdahmoundyah Muur’s Grantor/In Propria Persona,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

CITY OF CHARLOTTE; CHARLOTTE MECKLENBURG POLICE DEPARTMENT; T. BOBREK; JOHN DOE,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Robert J. Conrad, Jr., Chief District Judge. (3:11-cv-00131-RJC-DCK)

Submitted: February 9, 2012 Decided: February 13, 2012

Before WILKINSON, AGEE, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Noble Tornello Fontaine Pierce El-Bey, Appellant Pro Se. Richard Rustin Perlungher, CHARLOTTE-MECKLENBURG POLICE DEPARTMENT, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Tornello Fontaine appeals the district court’s order

accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and

granting Defendants’ motion to dismiss Fontaine’s

(2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find

no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons

stated by the district court. See Fontaine v. City of

Charlotte, No. 3:11-cv-00131-RJC-DCK (W.D.N.C. Oct. 7, 2011).

Further, we deny Fontaine’s motion for sanctions and for a grand

jury trial and, accordingly, deny as moot Defendants-Appellees’

motion to strike Fontaine’s motion. We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2