Myles Spires v. Lieutenant Harbaugh
Myles Spires v. Lieutenant Harbaugh
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 11-7127
MYLES SPIRES, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. LIEUTENANT HARBAUGH; OFFICER CROWE, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Richard D. Bennett, District Judge. (1:10-cv-01597-RDB)
Submitted: February 9, 2012 Decided: February 13, 2012
Before WILKINSON, AGEE, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Myles Spires, Appellant Pro Se. Nichole Cherie Gatewood, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: Myles Spires appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint and denying his motions for appointment of counsel and to supplement the complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Spires v. Harbaugh, No. 1:10-cv-01597- RDB (D. Md. filed Aug. 5, 2011; entered Aug. 8, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.