Charles Hinton v. Michael Henderson

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Charles Hinton v. Michael Henderson

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-7339

CHARLES EVERETTE HINTON,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

MICHAEL W. HENDERSON; TERESA BROADWAY; ANDREW RUDGERS, Probation Officer,

Defendants - Appellees,

and

PETER S. GILCHRIST; JOHN DOE,

Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Robert J. Conrad, Jr., Chief District Judge. (3:10-cv-00505-RJC-DLH)

Submitted: February 9, 2012 Decided: February 14, 2012

Before WILKINSON, AGEE, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Charles Everette Hinton, Appellant Pro Se. Sean Francis Perrin, WOMBLE CARLYLE SANDRIDGE & RICE, PLLC, Charlotte, North Carolina; Oliver Gray Wheeler, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NORTH CAROLINA, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Charles Everette Hinton seeks to appeal the district

court’s order dismissing Michael Henderson from his

42 U.S.C. § 1983

(2006) action and denying his motion for default judgment

against Teresa Broadway. This court may exercise jurisdiction

only over final orders,

28 U.S.C. § 1291

(2006), and certain

interlocutory and collateral orders,

28 U.S.C. § 1292

(2006);

Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp.,

337 U.S. 541, 545-46

(1949). The order Hinton seeks to appeal

is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or

collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack

of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

DISMISSED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished