Steven Bradford v. Officer Pruitt
Steven Bradford v. Officer Pruitt
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 11-7179
STEVEN KARL EDWARD BRADFORD,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
OFFICER E. PRUITT, Co II, 3-11 shift; LIEUTENANT C. WIDDOWSON, 3-11 shift; SERGEANT KESTLER, 3-11 shift, each in his individual and official capacity,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. William D. Quarles, Jr., District Judge. (1:10-cv-03619-WDQ)
Submitted: January 30, 2012 Decided: February 15, 2012
Before DUNCAN, WYNN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Steven Karl Edward Bradford, Appellant Pro Se. Sarah W. Rice, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Steven Karl Edward Bradford appeals the district
court’s order denying relief on his
42 U.S.C. § 1983(2006)
complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court. Bradford v. Pruitt, No. 1:10-cv-03619-WDQ (D.
Md. Aug. 26, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished