Steven Bradford v. Officer Pruitt

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Steven Bradford v. Officer Pruitt

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-7179

STEVEN KARL EDWARD BRADFORD,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

OFFICER E. PRUITT, Co II, 3-11 shift; LIEUTENANT C. WIDDOWSON, 3-11 shift; SERGEANT KESTLER, 3-11 shift, each in his individual and official capacity,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. William D. Quarles, Jr., District Judge. (1:10-cv-03619-WDQ)

Submitted: January 30, 2012 Decided: February 15, 2012

Before DUNCAN, WYNN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Steven Karl Edward Bradford, Appellant Pro Se. Sarah W. Rice, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Steven Karl Edward Bradford appeals the district

court’s order denying relief on his

42 U.S.C. § 1983

(2006)

complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the

district court. Bradford v. Pruitt, No. 1:10-cv-03619-WDQ (D.

Md. Aug. 26, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished