Robert Warren v. Smith Debnam Narron Drake

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Robert Warren v. Smith Debnam Narron Drake

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-1525

ROBERT WARREN; JACQUELIN WARREN,

Plaintiffs - Appellants,

v.

SMITH DEBNAM NARRON DRAKE SAINTSING & MYERS, LLP; ADAM M. GOTTSEGEN,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Wilmington. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (7:10-cv-00071-BO)

Submitted: January 26, 2012 Decided: February 17, 2012

Before NIEMEYER and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Craig M. Shapiro, KEOGH LAW, LTD, Chicago, Illinois; Richard J. Rubin, Santa Fe, New Mexico, for Appellants. John D. Burns, Camden R. Webb, Erica T. Meyers, WILLIAMS MULLEN, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Robert Warren and Jacquelin Warren appeal the district

court’s order dismissing their complaint under the Fair Debt

Collection Practices Act,

15 U.S.C. § 1692

et seq. (2006). We

have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court. Warren v. Smith Debnam Narron Drake Saintsing & Myers,

LLP, No. 7:10-cv-00071-BO (E.D.N.C. Apr. 19, 2011). We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished