Gerald Henneghan v. Jonathan Roach

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Gerald Henneghan v. Jonathan Roach, 466 F. App'x 195 (4th Cir. 2012)

Gerald Henneghan v. Jonathan Roach

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Gerald Henneghan appeals the district court’s orders dismissing his amended employment discrimination complaint, denying his motions for reconsideration, and denying various nondispositive motions. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Henneghan v. Smith, No. 1:11-cv-00247LMB-JFA (E.D. Va. May 3, 2011; May 4, 2011; May 5, 2011; Sept. 1, 2011; Sept. 12, 2011; Sept. 19, 2011; Sept. 30, 2011; Oct. 3, 2011; Oct. 5, 2011). We deny Henneghan’s requests for counsel, recusal, and other relief on appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Reference

Full Case Name
Gerald HENNEGHAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Jonathan ROACH; Kristine Roach, A/K/A Krissy Roach, A/K/A Joy Roach; Fedex Corporation; Fedex Office, Defendants-Appellees, and Frederick W. Smith, Chief Executive Officer, Fedex Corporation; Brian D. Phillips, Chief Executive Officer, Fedex Corporation; Joy Roach, Defendants
Status
Unpublished