Charles Simms v. Thomas Dame

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Charles Simms v. Thomas Dame

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-2122

CHARLES E. SIMMS,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

THOMAS DAME,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Alexander Williams, Jr., District Judge. (8:11-cv-02420-AW)

Submitted: February 16, 2012 Decided: February 21, 2012

Before SHEDD, KEENAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Charles Simms, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Charles Simms appeals the district court’s order

denying relief on his

42 U.S.C. § 1983

(2006) complaint and

denying his motion for appointment of counsel. We have reviewed

the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm

for the reasons stated by the district court. Simms v. Dame,

No. 8:11-cv-02420-AW (D. Md. Sept. 16, 2011). We deny Simms’

motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished