United States v. Deangelo McLaurin

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

United States v. Deangelo McLaurin

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-5088

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

DEANGELO MCLAURIN,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. David C. Keesler, Magistrate Judge. (3:11-cr-00111-RJC-DSC-1)

Submitted: February 16, 2012 Decided: February 21, 2012

Before SHEDD, KEENAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Deangelo McLaurin, Appellant Pro Se. Amy Elizabeth Ray, Assistant United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Deangelo McLaurin seeks to appeal the magistrate

judge’s order denying his motion to dismiss the indictment.

This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders,

28 U.S.C. § 1291

(2006), and certain interlocutory and collateral

orders,

28 U.S.C. § 1292

(2006); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v.

Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp.,

337 U.S. 541, 545-46

(1949). The

order McLaurin seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an

appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we

grant the Government’s motion to dismiss and dismiss the appeal

for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented

in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

DISMISSED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished