United States v. Arthur Outlaw
United States v. Arthur Outlaw
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 11-7435
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
ARTHUR OUTLAW, a/k/a Ace, a/k/a Aceyon Rogers,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Danville. Jackson L. Kiser, Senior District Judge. (4:00-cr-70114-JLK-1)
Submitted: February 16, 2012 Decided: February 22, 2012
Before SHEDD, KEENAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Arthur Alan Outlaw, Appellant Pro Se. Donald Ray Wolthuis, Assistant United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Arthur Alan Outlaw appeals the district court’s order
reducing his sentence under
18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006).
Outlaw claims that the district court erred in its reduction
calculation and in denying him a hearing. We find no such
error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order.
United States v. Outlaw, No. 4:00-cr-70114-JLK-1 (W.D. Va. Sept.
20, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished