U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2012

United States v. Stacey Harris

United States v. Stacey Harris
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided February 22, 2012 · Shedd, Keenan, Wynn
466 F. App'x 215

United States v. Stacey Harris

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Stacey Cornelius Harris appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for a reduction of sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Harris, No. 4:07-cr-00011-JLK-2 (W.D.Va. Nov. 4, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.