United States v. Stacey Harris
United States v. Stacey Harris
466 F. App'x 215
United States v. Stacey Harris
Opinion
Stacey Cornelius Harris appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for a reduction of sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Harris, No. 4:07-cr-00011-JLK-2 (W.D.Va. Nov. 4, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.