United States v. Little Childress
United States v. Little Childress
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 11-7531
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff – Appellee,
v.
LITTLE TOM CHILDRESS,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, Senior District Judge. (7:94-cr-40106-JLK-6)
Submitted: February 16, 2012 Decided: February 22, 2012
Before SHEDD, KEENAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Little Tom Childress, Appellant Pro Se. Ronald Andrew Bassford, Assistant United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Little Tom Childress appeals the district court’s
order dismissing without prejudice his petition for a writ of
error coram nobis. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court. United States v. Childress, No.
7:94-cr-40106-JLK-6 (W.D. Va. Oct. 31, 2011). We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished