UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-2203

MICHAEL A. SCOTT,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

CITY OF NORFOLK; REGINA V.K. WILLIAMS; BERNARD A. PISHKO; K. HANNAN; S. MICHAEL; E. ZYSK,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District Judge. (2:10-cv-00611-RAJ-DEM)

Submitted: February 14, 2012 Decided: February 23, 2012

Before NIEMEYER, SHEDD, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Michael A. Scott, Appellant Pro Se. Melvin Wayne Ringer, CITY ATTORNEY’S OFFICE, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Michael A. Scott appeals the district court’s order

denying relief on his

(2006) complaint. We

have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court. Scott v. City of Norfolk, No. 2:10-cv-00611-RAJ-DEM

(E.D. Va. Sept. 30, 2011). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented

in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2