Jamie Desper v. Jack Lee

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Jamie Desper v. Jack Lee

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-7554

JAMIE PAUL DESPER,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

SUPERINTENDENT JACK LEE; MAJOR LORI NICHOLSON; LT. FRED BYRD; MR. JOHN LILLY; MAJOR LARRY DULL,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Glen E. Conrad, Chief District Judge. (7:10-cv-00473-GEC-RSB)

Submitted: February 16, 2012 Decided: February 23, 2012

Before SHEDD, KEENAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jamie Paul Desper, Appellant Pro Se. Rosalie Fessier, TIMBERLAKE, SMITH, THOMAS & MOSES, PC, Staunton, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Jamie Paul Desper appeals the district court’s order

entering summary judgment on several of the claims raised in his

42 U.S.C. § 1983

(2006) complaint and dismissing the remainder

of them under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b) (2006). We have reviewed the

record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for

the reasons stated by the district court. Desper v. Lee, No.

7:10-cv-00473-GEC-RSB (W.D. Va. Oct. 20, 2011). We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished