Jamie Desper v. Jack Lee
Jamie Desper v. Jack Lee
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 11-7554
JAMIE PAUL DESPER,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
SUPERINTENDENT JACK LEE; MAJOR LORI NICHOLSON; LT. FRED BYRD; MR. JOHN LILLY; MAJOR LARRY DULL,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Glen E. Conrad, Chief District Judge. (7:10-cv-00473-GEC-RSB)
Submitted: February 16, 2012 Decided: February 23, 2012
Before SHEDD, KEENAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Jamie Paul Desper, Appellant Pro Se. Rosalie Fessier, TIMBERLAKE, SMITH, THOMAS & MOSES, PC, Staunton, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Jamie Paul Desper appeals the district court’s order
entering summary judgment on several of the claims raised in his
42 U.S.C. § 1983(2006) complaint and dismissing the remainder
of them under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b) (2006). We have reviewed the
record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for
the reasons stated by the district court. Desper v. Lee, No.
7:10-cv-00473-GEC-RSB (W.D. Va. Oct. 20, 2011). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished