United States v. Alvin Rhodes
United States v. Alvin Rhodes
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 11-7606
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
ALVIN RHODES,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Charlottesville. Norman K. Moon, Senior District Judge. (3:08-cr-00048-NKM-1)
Submitted: February 16, 2012 Decided: February 23, 2012
Before SHEDD, KEENAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Alvin Rhodes, Appellant Pro Se. Nancy Spodick Healey, Assistant United States Attorney, Charlottesville, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Alvin Rhodes appeals the district court’s order
denying his motion filed pursuant to
18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006)
and the district court’s order denying reconsideration of that
motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court. United States v. Rhodes, No. 3:08-cr-00048-NKM-
1 (W.D. Va. Oct. 20, 2011, Nov. 17, 2011). We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished