United States v. Alvin Rhodes

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

United States v. Alvin Rhodes

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-7606

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

ALVIN RHODES,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Charlottesville. Norman K. Moon, Senior District Judge. (3:08-cr-00048-NKM-1)

Submitted: February 16, 2012 Decided: February 23, 2012

Before SHEDD, KEENAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Alvin Rhodes, Appellant Pro Se. Nancy Spodick Healey, Assistant United States Attorney, Charlottesville, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Alvin Rhodes appeals the district court’s order

denying his motion filed pursuant to

18 U.S.C. § 3582

(c) (2006)

and the district court’s order denying reconsideration of that

motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the

district court. United States v. Rhodes, No. 3:08-cr-00048-NKM-

1 (W.D. Va. Oct. 20, 2011, Nov. 17, 2011). We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished