United States v. Anif Williams
United States v. Anif Williams
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 11-7666
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff – Appellee,
v.
ANIF CHRISTOPHER WILLIAMS,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Charlottesville. James P. Jones, District Judge. (3:93-cr-00010-JPJ-2)
Submitted: February 16, 2012 Decided: February 23, 2012
Before SHEDD, KEENAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Anif Christopher Williams, Appellant Pro Se. Jennie L.M. Waering, Assistant United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Anif Christopher Williams appeals the district court’s
order denying his
18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006) motion. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United
States v. Williams, No. 3:93-cr-00010-JPJ-2 (W.D. Va. Nov. 21,
2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished