United States v. Anif Williams

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

United States v. Anif Williams

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-7666

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff – Appellee,

v.

ANIF CHRISTOPHER WILLIAMS,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Charlottesville. James P. Jones, District Judge. (3:93-cr-00010-JPJ-2)

Submitted: February 16, 2012 Decided: February 23, 2012

Before SHEDD, KEENAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Anif Christopher Williams, Appellant Pro Se. Jennie L.M. Waering, Assistant United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Anif Christopher Williams appeals the district court’s

order denying his

18 U.S.C. § 3582

(c) (2006) motion. We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United

States v. Williams, No. 3:93-cr-00010-JPJ-2 (W.D. Va. Nov. 21,

2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished