United States v. Terence Scott

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

United States v. Terence Scott

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-7685

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

TERENCE DEVON SCOTT,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Lynchburg. Norman K. Moon, Senior District Judge. (6:05-cr-00015-NKM-2)

Submitted: February 16, 2012 Decided: February 23, 2012

Before SHEDD, KEENAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Terence Devon Scott, Appellant Pro Se. Craig Jon Jacobsen, I, Assistant United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Terence Devon Scott appeals the district court’s order

denying his motion to reduce his sentence and its subsequent

order denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed

the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm

for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v.

Scott, No. 6:05-cr-00015-NKM-2 (W.D. Va. Nov. 17, 2011; Dec. 15,

2011) We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished