United States v. Janison Veal

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

United States v. Janison Veal

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-7706

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

JANISON VEAL, a/k/a Jason,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Martinsburg. John Preston Bailey, Chief District Judge. (3:02-cr-00043-JPB-JES-1)

Submitted: February 16, 2012 Decided: February 23, 2012

Before SHEDD, KEENAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Janison Veal, Appellant Pro Se. Paul Thomas Camilletti, Thomas Oliver Mucklow, Assistant United States Attorneys, Martinsburg, West Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Janison Veal appeals the district court’s orders

granting Veal a sentence reduction under

18 U.S.C. § 3582

(c)(2)

(2006) and denying Veal’s motion for reconsideration. We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United

States v. Veal No. 3:02-cr-00043-JPB-JES-1 (N.D.W. Va. Nov. 1,

2011; Dec. 16, 2011). We also deny Veal’s motion for

transcripts at government expense and to proceed on appeal

without prepayment of fees as moot. We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished