U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2012

United States v. Antone Poindexter

United States v. Antone Poindexter
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided February 27, 2012

United States v. Antone Poindexter

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-7189

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. ANTONE HENRY POINDEXTER, Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, Senior District Judge. (3:97-cr-00079-JCC-1; 3:11-cv-00175-REP)

Submitted: February 23, 2012 Decided: February 27, 2012

Before MOTZ, DAVIS, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Antone Henry Poindexter, Appellant Pro Se. Stephen Wiley Miller, Stephen David Schiller, Assistant United States Attorneys, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Antone Henry Poindexter appeals the district court’s order addressing Poindexter’s December 1, 2010, letter. In its order, the district court declined to resentence Poindexter but it did order the Probation Office to amend Poindexter’s presentence report to account for the fact that a prior New Jersey conviction had been vacated. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Poindexter’s motion for appointment of counsel and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Poindexter, Nos. 3:97-cr-00079-JCC-1; 3:11-cv-00175-REP (E.D. Va. Aug. 22, 2011).

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.