Earl Thomas v. Benjamin Ulep

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Earl Thomas v. Benjamin Ulep

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-7319

EARL THOMAS,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

BENJAMIN ULEP, Medical Doctor; BENJAMIN ULEP, Individual,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Senior District Judge. (1:10-cv-00245-CMH-JFA)

Submitted: February 23, 2012 Decided: February 27, 2012

Before MOTZ, DAVIS, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Earl B. Thomas, III, Appellant Pro Se. Elizabeth Martin Muldowney, RAWLS & MCNELIS, PC, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Earl Thomas appeals the district court’s orders

denying relief on his

42 U.S.C. § 1983

(2006) complaint and

denying Thomas’ motion to amend his complaint to add new

defendants. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the

district court. See Thomas v. Ulep, No. 1:10-cv-00245-CMH-JFA

(E.D. Va. filed Mar. 9 & entered Mar. 10, 2011; filed Sept. 13 &

entered Sept. 14, 2011). Further, we deny Thomas’ motion to

compel the production of documents. We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished