U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2012

Earl Thomas v. Benjamin Ulep

Earl Thomas v. Benjamin Ulep
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided February 27, 2012

Earl Thomas v. Benjamin Ulep

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-7319

EARL THOMAS, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. BENJAMIN ULEP, Medical Doctor; BENJAMIN ULEP, Individual, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Senior District Judge. (1:10-cv-00245-CMH-JFA)

Submitted: February 23, 2012 Decided: February 27, 2012

Before MOTZ, DAVIS, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Earl B. Thomas, III, Appellant Pro Se. Elizabeth Martin Muldowney, RAWLS & MCNELIS, PC, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Earl Thomas appeals the district court’s orders denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint and denying Thomas’ motion to amend his complaint to add new defendants. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Thomas v. Ulep, No. 1:10-cv-00245-CMH-JFA (E.D. Va. filed Mar. 9 & entered Mar. 10, 2011; filed Sept. 13 & entered Sept. 14, 2011). Further, we deny Thomas’ motion to compel the production of documents. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.