U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2012

Charles Brooks, III v. John Doe

Charles Brooks, III v. John Doe
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided February 28, 2012

Charles Brooks, III v. John Doe

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-7629

CHARLES BROOKS, III, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. JOHN DOE, Warden Senior of Sussex II State Prison; VARGO, Assistant Warden, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Mark S. Davis, District Judge. (2:11-cv-00568-MSD-FBS)

Submitted: February 23, 2012 Decided: February 28, 2012

Before MOTZ, DAVIS, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Charles Brooks, III, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Charles Brooks, III, appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. Brooks v. Doe, No. 2:11-cv-00568-MSD-FBS (E.D. Va. Nov. 9, 2011). We also deny Brooks’ pending motion for transcripts at government expense. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.