U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2012

United States v. Patrick Wilson

United States v. Patrick Wilson
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided February 28, 2012

United States v. Patrick Wilson

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-7662

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. PATRICK FLOYD WILSON, a/k/a Little Patrick, a/k/a Anthony Wilson, a/k/a Anthony Brown, Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Harrisonburg. Michael F. Urbanski, District Judge. (5:96-cr-30056-MFU-1)

Submitted: February 23, 2012 Decided: February 28, 2012

Before MOTZ, DAVIS, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Patrick Floyd Wilson, Appellant Pro Se. Timothy J. Heaphy, United States Attorney, Thomas Jack Bondurant, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Patrick Floyd Wilson appeals the district court’s order denying his Fed. R. Crim. P. 36 motion to correct a clerical error in the judgment issued following his resentencing. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Wilson, No. 5:96-cr- 30056-MFU-1 (W.D. Va. Nov. 23, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.