United States v. Patrick Wilson
United States v. Patrick Wilson
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 11-7662
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
PATRICK FLOYD WILSON, a/k/a Little Patrick, a/k/a Anthony Wilson, a/k/a Anthony Brown,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Harrisonburg. Michael F. Urbanski, District Judge. (5:96-cr-30056-MFU-1)
Submitted: February 23, 2012 Decided: February 28, 2012
Before MOTZ, DAVIS, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Patrick Floyd Wilson, Appellant Pro Se. Timothy J. Heaphy, United States Attorney, Thomas Jack Bondurant, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Patrick Floyd Wilson appeals the district court’s
order denying his Fed. R. Crim. P. 36 motion to correct a
clerical error in the judgment issued following his
resentencing. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court. United States v. Wilson, No. 5:96-cr-
30056-MFU-1 (W.D. Va. Nov. 23, 2011). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished